LLM System Design Interview, issue 49, May 12, 2026

The Vocab Embedding Paradox

Senior Pre-training Engineer interview at Google DeepMind, and the interviewer asks:

You’ve trained a series of smaller proxy models to project scaling laws for your next 100B+ flagship LLM. However, your parameter-to-loss plot isn’t a straight line in log-log space, it’s bending noticeably at the low-parameter end. Assuming training was perfectly stable, what basic structural miscalculation is ruining your extrapolation curve?

Don’t say: The smallest models are underfitting due to a suboptimal learning rate schedule. We need to tune the cool-down phase or adjust the batch size to ensure the proxy models hit their true minimums.

How a massive 128k vocabulary quietly breaks scaling math on proxy models, and why counting only non-embedding parameters is the key to safely authorizing a 100B+ run.

The full answer, with the mechanism and the arithmetic, is for paid subscribers on Substack.

Read it on Substack

Get the next one

Free on Substack. Unsubscribe in one click.