Issue 49, May 12, 2026

The Vocab Embedding Paradox

Senior Pre-training Engineer interview at Google DeepMind, and the interviewer asks:

“You’ve trained a series of smaller proxy models to project scaling laws for your next 100B+ flagship LLM. However, your parameter-to-loss plot isn’t a straight line in log-log space, it’s bending noticeably at the low-parameter end. Assuming training was perfectly stable, what basic structural miscalculation is ruining your extrapolation curve?”

Don’t say: “The smallest models are underfitting due to a suboptimal learning rate schedule. We need to tune the cool-down phase or adjust the batch size to ensure the proxy models hit their true minimums.”

How a massive 128k vocabulary quietly breaks scaling math on proxy models, and why counting only non-embedding parameters is the key to safely authorizing a 100B+ run.

Share this trapShare on LinkedIn

The full answer, with the mechanism and the arithmetic, is for paid subscribers on Substack.

Read it on Substack

Get the next one

Free on Substack. Unsubscribe in one click.

More traps set at Google DeepMind